This is supported by the positive trend found for the 1-minute walk test, directly after ending the fitness program. Although two components of the program may have potential to improve mobility capacity, the added value of improving mobility capacity for increasing physical activity remains unclear. This should be the subject of future research. An explanation for not demonstrating an intervention effect on fitness and self-reported fatigue might be the scheduled reduction in Dasatinib cell line fitness training frequency to once a week in the third and fourth month of the training period. The reduction was planned to limit the burden on parents and children, and to allow the children

to develop physical activities in order to create a transitional period between the organised fitness training and self-developed activities. Since sports club participation did not improve after the physical stimulation program,

it is likely that children did not succeed in initiating further physical activities, resulting in insufficient training Modulators volume to elicit a significant fitness improvement. However, www.selleckchem.com/products/BI6727-Volasertib.html the beneficial effect of a higher fitness training volume on physical activity is not yet clear. A previous 9-month fitness training program of four times per week only resulted in a positive trend in physical activity, despite an effect on fitness.9 The short-term improvement in the children’s attitudes towards the disadvantage of sports, and the long-term trend for improving the children’s attitudes towards the advantages of sports are promising, considering the lack of effect previously found on the attitude of adolescents with cerebral palsy after counselling.11 However, the small effect sizes for attitude towards sports in our population,

3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase which is already very positive about sports, weaken the clinical relevance of these improvements. Socially desired answering might also have influenced this subjective measure. This is supported by the lack of effect on physical activity or sports participation, which was expected to increase by a more positive attitude.34 It is possible that the improvement in attitude towards sports was insufficient to improve physical activity. Also, environmental barriers, such as lack of transportation and availability of facilities,35 may have restricted starting up (sports) activities despite small improvements in attitude. Future studies aimed at improving physical activity should assess the presence of environmental barriers and systematically examine whether influencing these barriers contributes to a more active lifestyle. An important study limitation is that it was not possible to draw any conclusion about the effectiveness of the separate components of the intervention. More insight into the contribution of the separate components of the program is needed, in order to understand how they influence physical activity, by varying one component at the same time.