The unconditional VEacq, however, offers a direct means to assess the rate of serotype replacement within vaccinated hosts. A more detailed discussion of the topic with some examples can be found in a previous article [11]. Combined vaccine efficacy against acquisition and duration (VET) is the vaccine-induced relative reduction in the expected time a susceptible subject will be colonised with VT pneumococci

(Fig. 1). This estimand is more general than VEacq and can be estimated from cross-sectional data under weaker conditions about the process of colonisation (see Section this website 4). Vaccine efficacy against prevalence (VEP) is the vaccine-induced relative reduction in the prevalence of VT carriage. This is another summary measure of vaccine efficacy. However, it is to be noted that VEPmay be much less than VEacqestimated in the same study [10]. This occurs in particular if the baseline prevalence of VT colonisation is high. The difference between VEP and EGFR inhibitor VEacq follows from the fact that VEP is confounded by the (different) times that vaccinees and controls are susceptible to acquisition. Moreover, the VEP efficacy against all vaccine serotypes is not a simple function of the serotype-specific VEP efficacies. Serotype-specific vaccine efficacy can be defined

by considering acquisition of a certain serotype. When based on hazards conditional on susceptibility, the serotype-specific and aggregate (i.e., all vaccine-type) efficacies for VEacq and VET, are coherent in the sense Urease that the aggregate efficacy is a weighted average of VT specific efficacies. Essentially, the weights are the type-specific hazards of colonisation, which means that the aggregate efficacy

puts more weight on the more commonly carried serotypes [11]. While the aggregate efficacy against all vaccine types is the obvious primary colonisation endpoint in a phase III trial, methods to estimate serotype-specific efficacies are needed as well. Comparison of the existing and new pneumococcal vaccine products may have to be conducted on a serotype-basis, if there are concerns about the lack of efficacy for individual serotypes or if the investigational vaccine is efficacious against a wider range of serotypes than the (control) pneumococcal vaccine. Moreover, serotype-specific estimates of efficacy may be important for predicting the long-term effectiveness of vaccination, together with information about serotype-specific disease propensities, in different epidemiological settings with different serotype distributions in carriage. Finally, it is important to recognise that only serotype-specific parameters have the potential to address vaccine efficacy against serotypes that are rarely detected in carriage, and even this requires the studies be sufficiently large to collect enough endpoints from these rare episodes. In addition to phase III studies, vaccine efficacy parameters involving acquisition can be employed in phase IV studies.