“
“The first IGRA patents were issued in 1987. Rothel (1992) demonstrated rapid IFN-gamma response at 4 h culture. Region of difference 1 (RD1) antigens were discovered by Andersen in 1996. The Rapid Elispot was developed and announced by Lalvani in 1996. After development, the first diagnostic use in humans was in 1998 and 1999 (Mustafa, Ravin, Johnson, Demissie, etc.). The CD4 inclusive Elispot IGRA

was developed in 2000 (Pathan, Lalvani). The FDA approved the first IGRA for testing in humans in 2002, and the RD1 IGRAs in 2004 (QFT-Gold),2007 (QFT-In-Tube) and 2008 (T-Spot). The high specificity for IGRAs is likely the most important of QFT’s benefits over the TST. Without high specificity, treating LTBI is a low reward activity. Poor specificity of the TST has led to over-treatment in the

USA, LTBI neglect in many other industrialized countries, 3-Methyladenine price and misconceptions about the nature of TB infection, IGRA specificity allows us to re-assess some TB dogmas: are one third of the world’s population truly infected with TB or are they simply TST-positive? Do 10% of infected people (TST-positive) later develop active TB? What about the dogma that a >15 mm TST check details response always indicates true infection? Should ‘Once infected, always infected’ (if not treated) be ‘Once TST-positive, always TST-positive’ (usually)? With a highly specific test, many of these dogmas are likely to be disproved. But the IGRA tests are not perfect, and clinicians still

need to make the final AG-014699 ic50 diagnosis based on all the evidence. In time, there will be newer IGRA versions from Cellestis, and presumably others, with both higher efficacy and perhaps ease of use. But the IGRAs of today are clearly a major advance over the TST.”
“Objective: To determine the incidence and risk factors for maternal morbidity during childbirth hospitalization. Methods: Maternal morbidities were determined using ICD9-CM and vital records codes from linked hospital discharge and vital records data for 1,572,909 singleton births in California during 2005-2007. Socio-demographic, obstetric and hospital volume risk factors were estimated using mixed effects logistic regression models. Results: The maternal morbidity rate was 241/1000 births. The most common morbidities were episiotomy, pelvic trauma, maternal infection, postpartum hemorrhage and severe laceration. Preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.96; 95% confidence interval 2.8,3.13), maternal age over 35 years, (AOR: 1.92; 1.79,2.06), vaginal birth after cesarean, (AOR: 1.81; 1.47,2.23) and repeat cesarean birth (AOR: 1.99; 1.87,2.12) conferred the highest odds of severe morbidity. Non-white women were more likely to suffer morbidity. Conclusions: Nearly one in four California women experienced complications during childbirth hospitalization. Significant health disparities in maternal childbirth outcomes persist in the USA.