The aspirate was collected in a vial and stored for weighing The

The aspirate was collected in a vial and stored for weighing. The haemodynamic and pulmonary measures were recorded 1 min later. The secretions obtained with each aspiration were collected and stored in a collection flask and weighed on an electronic scale by an investigator blinded to whether the sample was from

the experimental or control group. The pulmonary measures recorded were: peak inspiratory pressure, endexpiratory pressure, and tidal volume, each measured via the mechanical ventilator. Dynamic compliance was calculated as the tidal volume divided by the difference between the peak inspiratory pressure and the endexpiratory pressure. The haemodynamic measures recorded Neratinib in vitro were: heart rate, respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure, and oxyhaemoglobin saturation measured

by peripheral pulse oximetry. The minimal important difference in secretions aspirated with a single treatment has not yet been established. We therefore nominated 0.7 g as the between-group difference we sought to identify. Assuming a SD of 1 g, 68 participants (34 per group) would provide 80% power, at the 2-sided 5% significance level, to detect a 0.7 g difference between the experimental and control groups as statistically significant. Continuous data were summarised as means and standard deviations and categorical data were summarised as frequencies and percentages. Normal distribution of the data was confirmed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Between-group differences Selleck MG-132 in change from baseline were analysed using unpaired t-tests. Mean differences (95% CI) between groups are presented. Within-group changes were analysed using a paired samples t test. Chi-squared or Fischer’s exact test were used for

categorical variables. Data were analysed by intention to treat. Recruitment and data collection were carried out between May 2008 and May 2010. During the study period, 1304 patients were screened for eligibility. Sixty-six met the eligibility criteria and were randomised: 34 in the experimental group and 32 in the control group. The flow of participants through the trial and the reasons for the exclusion of some participants are illustrated why in Figure 1. Baseline characteristics of the participants were similar between the allocated groups (Table 1). Interventions to the experimental group were provided by the Intensive Care Unit physiotherapist, who had seven years of clinical experience, including four years in intensive care. The Intensive Care Unit of the ClĂ­nicas Hospital in Porto Alegre, Brazil, was the only centre to recruit and test patients in the trial. The Intensive Care Unit has 25 adult medical-surgical beds and a throughput of 1117 patients per year. All randomised participants completed the trial, including both interventions as randomly allocated and all outcome measures.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>