Test-retest reliability for all exercises obtained in our setting was consistent with previous findings: ICCr: SJ O.97, CMJ 0.99, push-up 0.98, reverse grip chins 0.96, leg closed barrier 0.90, parallel dips 0.95

[50–55]. Statical analysis A one-way Anova for repeated measurements was used with significance placed at p < 0.05. When appropriate a Bonferroni post hoc test was used to compare selected data. Results No significant differences in anthropometric variables or in athletic performance were detected at basal conditions before https://www.selleckchem.com/products/cftrinh-172.html either experimental trial. There was a significant difference pre and post VLCKD in body weight (from 69.6 ± 7.3 Kg to 68.0 ± 7.5 Kg p < 0.05) (Figure 2a), fat mass (from 5.3 ± 1.3 Kg to 3.4 ± 0.8 Kg p < 0.001) (Figure 2b), fat percentage (pre 7.6 ± 1.4; post 5.0 ± 0.9; P < 0.001) and lean body mass percentage (from 92.4 ± 1.44 to 95.0 ± 1.0; P < 0.001) whilst there was no significant difference comparing pre and post WD. Moreover after VLCKD muscle mass

(pre 37.6 Kg ± 3.9; post 37.9 Kg ± 4.5) and lean body mass (pre 64.2 ± 6.5; post 64.6 ± 7.1) remained substantially constant (Table 4). Figure 2 Changes in body weight (a) and kilograms of fat (b) www.selleckchem.com/products/3-methyladenine.html before and after very low carbohydrate diet and western diet. SD are showed with bars. Table 4 Performance, anthropometric and body composition results befor and after diet intervention   VLCKD start VLCKD end WD start WD end performance results SJ 0.42 ± 0.04 0.42 ± 0.05 0.41 ± 0.04 0.40 ± 0.04 CMJ 0.45 ± 0.04 0.43 ± 0.05 0.43 ± 0.06 0.43 ± 0.05 reverse grip

chins 17 ± 4.2 16.6 ± 4.6 15.2 ± 3.4 15.2 ± 5.8 push-ups 36 ± 6.3 38.8 ± 4.7 37 ± 11.8 43.5 ± 18.1 legs closed barrier 19.2 ± 4.96 21.7 ± 6.35 Hydroxychloroquine chemical structure 17.2 ± 5.0 16 ± 4.77 parallel bar dips 25.8 ± 8.35 28.2 ± 9.31 23 ± 12.19 27 ± 10.61 Anthropometric and body composition results muscle Kg 37.6 ± 3.9 37.9 ± 4.5 38.4 ± 4.1 38.6 ± 4.5 Fat Kg 5.3 ± 1.3 3.4 ± 0.8 ** 5.1 ± 1.3 4.9 ± 1.1 fat % 7.6 ± 1.4 5.0 ± 0.9 ** 8.0 ± 1.3 7.7 ± 1.2 Lean body mass Kg 64.2 ± 6.5 63.1 ± 7.1 61.5 ± 4.3 61.8 ± 4.6 lean body mass % 92.4 ± 1.4 95.0 ± 1.0 ** 92.0 ± 1.3 92.3 ± 1.2 Weight 69.6 ± 7.3 68.0 ± 7.5 ** 70.1 ± 6.2 70.0 ± 6.3 Data are espresse as mean and SD. BMS202 Symbols: ** = p < 0.001 significant difference from baseline; * = p < 0.05 significant difference from basline. As can be seen in Table 4 there were no significant differences in any performance tests before and after VLCKD nor before and after WD. Discussion The aim of our research was to verify the effects of a VLCKD on power strength performance in elite athletes. It is well known that VLCKD’s promote weight loss very rapidly [56].