Much attention is also given to the need for short-term seed money and/or longer term financing for supporting alternative livelihood developments. Outside financing can sometimes be obtained for the start-up phase of a development project. However, JQ1 clinical trial Torell et al. [77] posit that in the long run grants are counterproductive to sustainability. Authors often suggest that money from PES markets [82] and [126],

lease money from entrepreneurial MPAs [171], trust funds [73] and [172], user fees [65] and [66], and micro-credit schemes [91] should be funneled towards alternative livelihood development, scholarships, tourism infrastructure, or health and social infrastructure (not just towards MPA selleck inhibitor management as is often argued). Cinner [167] makes a case that procuring funding is essential to help fishers break out of the poverty trap that necessitates their use of destructive fishing gear. Micro-credit schemes may show the most promise for empowering individuals and encouraging community ownership of development [76] and [77]. Finally, the creation of an enabling institutional and organizational environment can facilitate the implementation of alternative livelihood programs that maximize local benefits.

Policies that safeguard access and that recognize tenure can be key to ensuring that local communities benefit from tourism, that community property is not sold to outside interests, and that conflict is minimized with outside interests [11], [54], [75] and [98]. Development policies that restrict the scale and type of developments can also ensure that development is kept within ecologically and socially sustainable limits [127]. Mechanisms

to ensure that benefits are shared equitably and that leakage of financial and employment benefits is minimized need to be put into place [69], [74], [75], [89], [153], [173] and [174]. A wide variety of organizations at various scales can have important Bay 11-7085 roles to play in ensuring that development programs are successful [73] and [111]—including international NGOs acting as intermediaries in PES projects [126], businesses identifying development opportunities [76], and community and user associations advocating for local people [55]. Productive relationships with private sector partners – for example, through the development of private-sector developed ‘Entrepreneurial MPAs׳ [171] and [175]– may also benefit local communities through the payment of coral reef leases by hotels or diving companies for diving in trade for exclusion of fishers׳ withdrawal and access rights and patrolling services see also [180]. The effective management of MPAs is of critical importance for achieving desirable environmental outcomes, for ensuring local support, and for the long-term viability of livelihoods.