Homologues exist in all species and subspecies of Francisella, however, they are not identical to PdpC of LVS. For example, PdpC in both LVS and SCHU S4 contains 1,328 amino acids, whereas the F. novicida U112 homologue contains 1,325 amino acids. The former two show only 18 amino acid differences, whereas check details 71 and 72 amino acids (95% identity), respectively, are distinct compared to the F. novicida variant. Figure 1 shows a representation of the different genes found in the FPI, and the localization of pdpC at the end of one of the two putative operons. Figure 1 The Francisella pathogenicity island. The two operons are depicted as a sequence of

arrows in the direction of transcription. Arrows in light grey indicate genes with homology to known T6SS core components, while arrows in dark grey represent

genes that lack T6SS VX-689 nmr component homology. To investigate the subcellular localization of PdpC, LVS bacteria were separated into soluble, inner membrane, and outer membrane fractions and the amounts of the protein in each fraction determined learn more by immunoblot analysis. PdpC was found to be predominantly an inner membrane protein, but a small portion was also found in the soluble fraction (Figure 2). It is likely that the transmembrane regions identified in the in silico analysis may contribute to its membrane location. Figure 2 Subcellular localization of PdpC. LVS whole-cell lysate was separated into soluble, inner membrane (IM) and outer membrane (OM) fractions using ultracentrifugation and Sarkosyl treatment. After separation by SDS-PAGE, the presence of PdpC in each fraction was determined by Western blot using polyclonal anti-PdpC antibodies. Antibodies recognizing IglC and PdpB were used as markers for soluble and inner membrane fractions, respectively. mafosfamide Construction and phenotypic characterization of a ΔpdpC null mutant To determine the role of PdpC in F. tularensis LVS, an in-frame deletion mutant was constructed by deletion of both copies of the gene. To verify

the absence of PdpC in the mutant, immunoblot analysis with an anti-PdpC antibody was performed on bacterial pellets and real-time PCR was used to quantify the transcription levels of pdpC. No immunoreactive protein or gene transcript was detected in the mutant, whereas expression of the downstream pdpE gene was not affected (data not shown and Table 1), indicating that the deletion conferred no polar effect. For complementation in cis, the pdpC gene was introduced in the original site of one of the pathogenicity islands of the mutant. Table 1 Differences in FPI mRNA expression between ΔpdpC and LVS   Averagea P value vgrG −1.49 0.176 iglH −3.09 0.119 pdpC −6.8 × 10-6 <0.001 pdpE −0.26 0.913 iglD −3.46 0.010 iglC −3.99 0.055 iglB −2.97 0.040 iglA −3.75 0.080 a The results show the average fold change in gene expression from 7 experiments.