Basal transmission was monitored every 15 s with PP and SC stimul

Basal transmission was monitored every 15 s with PP and SC stimuli spaced 2 s apart. A 470 nm LED (CoolLED) or a solid-state single-photon laser (OEM lasers) was routed through the 60× objective and two pinholes to optically stimulate ChR2 or uncage RuBiGABA. See Supplemental Experimental Procedures www.selleckchem.com/products/Bortezomib.html for details. Animals were perfused with 1× PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 1× PBS.

We cut 50 μm sections with a vibratome following an overnight postfixation (4% PFA) of the brain. Slices were permeabilized, stained with antibodies, mounted on slides, and imaged on an inverted laser-scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 700). ChR2 expression and cell fills in live slices were imaged with a multiphoton microscope (Ultima, Prairie Technologies). See Supplemental Experimental Procedures for all details. Axograph X and ImageJ were used for electrophysiology data analysis and image processing, respectively. Kaleidagraph

(Synergy) and Prism (Graphpad) were used for plotting data and statistical analysis. Time course plots were generated using a box-car average of every four responses (1 min). For calculating the fold change in ITDP, PSP amplitudes were normalized to the GDC-0068 mean PSP amplitude during the first 5 min of baseline recording prior to ITDP induction for each individual experiment and then averaged to generate the mean. For comparing the effect of ITDP induction on response amplitudes, the data were derived from time points corresponding to 5 min before (pre) and 30–40 min after (post) induction. All statistical errors are standard errors of the population mean or boxcar mean (SEM); all p values (significance level set at p < 0.05) for t tests are two tailed and all ANOVAs were corrected for multiple comparisons using post hoc tests why as indicated. Figures were generated with Adobe Illustrator. Neurolucida (MicroBrightField)-based reconstructions of biocytin-filled CA1 PNs were used to generate a compartmental model in the NEURON simulation environment (Hines and Carnevale, 1997) matching the neuron’s digitized anatomy and its

measured τslow (recorded in synaptic and HCN blockers). See Supplemental Information for further details. J.B. and S.A.S. designed the study; J.B. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; K.V.S. performed the computational modeling; S.K.C. and J.B. performed the immunohistochemistry and imaging; H.T. and Z.J.H. generated the CCK-Cre driver and intersectional CCK IN specific transgenic mice; and J.B. and S.A.S. wrote the paper with help from the other authors. We thank K. Deisseroth, G. Fishell, and S. Sternson for generously providing reagents; V. Chevaleyre, J. Dudman, M. Larkum, M. Lovett-Barron, R. Piskorowski, H. Takahashi, P. Trifilieff, and T. Younts for technical advice; and K. Franks, F. Hitti, V. Johnstone, J. Kupferman, A. Losonczy, Z. Rosen, M. Russo, and B. Santoro for helpful comments on previous versions of the manuscript.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>