05, 95% CI: 0.004–0.1; 0.06, 95% CI: 0.0006–0.12). Retrospectively, terrorist attacks were perceived as a higher risk in Asia/Pacific than

in Africa (−0.05, 95% CI: −0.09 to −0.003), while malaria and general risk (not mosquitoes) were still considered as lower risks in Asia/Pacific than in Africa (0.06, 95% CI: 0.001–0.11; 0.05, 95% CI: 0.003–0.1). Post-travel risk perception was not different among gender, age groups, and travelers to Latin America versus Africa. The travelers’ overall perception of travel-associated health risks was mostly in accordance with the experts’ assessment and appears to be accurate for most risks, with the exception of accidents and STIs. Remarkably, all risks were perceived similarly or slightly lower after travel than before, except for accidents. Mosquitoes, selleck chemicals the number one perceived risk among travelers (before travel) and malaria, CHIR-99021 cost both “classic” pre-travel health topics, ranked highly among experts and travelers and were only

outranked by accidents. However, the tendency of having a lower post-travel risk perception was most distinct for malaria and mosquitoes (Figure 3). The interpretation of this finding remains ambiguous, as the associations with the term “mosquitoes” are unknown and might range from “nuisance” and local bite reactions to mosquito-borne diseases. This fact also applies to epidemic outbreaks which were rated as relatively low risk throughout. In general, destination-related differences in risk perception were small with the exception of malaria (Figures 3 and 4). In accordance with the prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum,[19] malaria was perceived as a lower risk in Asia/Pacific and Latin America than in Africa by both experts and travelers, confirming existing knowledge about the disease. The general risk of travel

was also considered lower in Asia/Pacific than in Africa. The popularity of travel to Asia/Pacific might lead to this region appearing less risky than other continents. However, terrorist attacks were perceived as a higher risk in Asia/Pacific than in Africa which might have been influenced by the relatively Phosphatidylinositol diacylglycerol-lyase high incidence of terrorist acts and political disturbances in Asia at the time of the study[20, 21] and their media coverage in Switzerland. This was estimated by the number of hits for the keywords “terror* asia*” compared to “terror* africa*”, “terror* south america*” and “terror* latin america*” between 1 January 2008 and 31 August 2009 on an archive portal for Swiss print media articles.[22] Regardless of their destinations, the travelers’ perception of VAEs was relatively high which is in accordance with European KAP studies describing negative attitudes toward vaccines and their potential adverse effects.